Geoscientist Artificial Intelligence
Geoscientist Artificial Intelligence
  • Home
  • AI Signal Processing
    • Calibration & Validation
    • Deconvolution
    • Inverse Q Filtering
    • Noise Attenuation
    • Multiple Attenuation
    • Static Correction
  • AI Imaging
    • Velocity & NMO Analysis
    • Time to Depth Convrsion
    • Stacking
    • Migration
    • Wave Equation Datuming
    • Anisotropy Analysis
  • AI Q-Interpretation
    • AI INVERSION
    • AI AVO Analysis
    • Seismic Attributes
    • Spectral Blending
    • Facies Analysis
  • AI Modeling
    • Ray Tracing
    • Waveform Modeling
    • Rock Physics Modeling
  • AI Depth Conversion(Dvlp)
    • Multi-Component Analysis
    • Time-Depth Relationships
    • Well Log Integration
    • Uncertainty Analysis
    • Advanced Computaion Tech
  • AI Data Integration(Dvlp)
    • Gravity and Magnetic Data
    • Electromagnetic (EM)
    • Advaned Data Fusion
  • AI FWI(Dvlp)
    • Modeling and Simulation
    • Regularized & Constraints
    • Model Parameterization
    • Other Data Integration
    • Anisotropy & Attenuation
  • More
    • Home
    • AI Signal Processing
      • Calibration & Validation
      • Deconvolution
      • Inverse Q Filtering
      • Noise Attenuation
      • Multiple Attenuation
      • Static Correction
    • AI Imaging
      • Velocity & NMO Analysis
      • Time to Depth Convrsion
      • Stacking
      • Migration
      • Wave Equation Datuming
      • Anisotropy Analysis
    • AI Q-Interpretation
      • AI INVERSION
      • AI AVO Analysis
      • Seismic Attributes
      • Spectral Blending
      • Facies Analysis
    • AI Modeling
      • Ray Tracing
      • Waveform Modeling
      • Rock Physics Modeling
    • AI Depth Conversion(Dvlp)
      • Multi-Component Analysis
      • Time-Depth Relationships
      • Well Log Integration
      • Uncertainty Analysis
      • Advanced Computaion Tech
    • AI Data Integration(Dvlp)
      • Gravity and Magnetic Data
      • Electromagnetic (EM)
      • Advaned Data Fusion
    • AI FWI(Dvlp)
      • Modeling and Simulation
      • Regularized & Constraints
      • Model Parameterization
      • Other Data Integration
      • Anisotropy & Attenuation
  • Home
  • AI Signal Processing
    • Calibration & Validation
    • Deconvolution
    • Inverse Q Filtering
    • Noise Attenuation
    • Multiple Attenuation
    • Static Correction
  • AI Imaging
    • Velocity & NMO Analysis
    • Time to Depth Convrsion
    • Stacking
    • Migration
    • Wave Equation Datuming
    • Anisotropy Analysis
  • AI Q-Interpretation
    • AI INVERSION
    • AI AVO Analysis
    • Seismic Attributes
    • Spectral Blending
    • Facies Analysis
  • AI Modeling
    • Ray Tracing
    • Waveform Modeling
    • Rock Physics Modeling
  • AI Depth Conversion(Dvlp)
    • Multi-Component Analysis
    • Time-Depth Relationships
    • Well Log Integration
    • Uncertainty Analysis
    • Advanced Computaion Tech
  • AI Data Integration(Dvlp)
    • Gravity and Magnetic Data
    • Electromagnetic (EM)
    • Advaned Data Fusion
  • AI FWI(Dvlp)
    • Modeling and Simulation
    • Regularized & Constraints
    • Model Parameterization
    • Other Data Integration
    • Anisotropy & Attenuation

seismic Facies analysis

Seismic facies analysis is a key step in seismic interpretation and reservoir characterization. It involves dividing a seismic volume (or section) into areas or intervals that show similar reflection characteristics, which are then interpreted in terms of depositional environment, lithology, and fluid content.

Seismic facies analysis is the interpretation of groups of seismic reflections based on their geometry, amplitude, continuity, frequency, and configuration, to infer the geological meaning such as sedimentary environment or rock type.


Key Seismic Attributes Used

Seismic facies are typically recognized by patterns in:

  • Amplitude – strength of reflection (indicates acoustic impedance contrasts). 
  • Continuity – degree of lateral persistence of reflectors (related to depositional uniformity). 
  • Frequency / bandwidth – sharpness or smoothness of reflections (related to layer thickness and lithologic variability). 
  • Configuration / geometry – reflection terminations (onlap, downlap, truncation) and shapes of reflectors (parallel, chaotic, hummocky, etc.). 
  • Phase – can indicate polarity or tuning effects.

Types of Seismic Facies Analysis

      1. Qualitative (visual) analysis 

  • Done by the interpreter visually examining seismic sections or time slices. 
  • Based on classical criteria defined by Mitchum et al. (1977) in seismic stratigraphy. 

      2. Quantitative (attribute-based) analysis 

  • Uses seismic attributes (e.g., RMS amplitude, instantaneous frequency, similarity) or machine learning techniques (e.g., PCA, SOM, K-means) to classify seismic facies automatically. 
  • Provides facies maps that can be correlated with well data.

Workflow

Typical workflow for seismic facies analysis:

  1. Define objective (e.g., reservoir delineation, channel detection). 
  2. Select seismic interval (horizon or volume). 
  3. Compute relevant seismic attributes. 
  4. Apply classification or clustering techniques (manual or automatic). 
  5. Interpret facies in geological terms (e.g., channel sand, shale, reef, etc.). 
  6. Validate with well logs, core data, or known geology.
     

Geological Significance

Seismic facies interpretation helps geoscientists to:

  • Identify depositional environments (fluvial, deltaic, turbiditic, reefal, etc.). 
  • Map reservoir distribution and quality. 
  • Detect stratigraphic traps or unconformities. 
  • Support 3D reservoir modeling.

Seismic Quantitative Facies Analysis

Seismic Quantitative Facies Analysis is the data-driven or numerical extension of traditional (qualitative) seismic facies interpretation.
Instead of relying only on visual inspection of reflection patterns, it uses measurable seismic attributes and statistical or machine learning methods to classify and predict facies objectively.

Quantitative seismic facies analysis involves the use of multi-attribute data, pattern recognition, and classification algorithms to automatically or semi-automatically define facies classes that reflect lithological or depositional variations.

It turns qualitative observations (like “high amplitude = sand”) into numerically defined relationships between seismic responses and rock properties.

Main Inputs

    1. Seismic attributes — e.g. 

  • Amplitude-related: RMS amplitude, average energy. 
  • Frequency-related: instantaneous frequency, bandwidth 
  • Continuity-related: semblance, coherence 
  • Morphologic: curvature, dip 

    2. Well data — facies logs, lithology, porosity, etc. 

    3. Machine learning methods — for clustering or classification.

Workflow

  1. Select seismic interval or horizon. 
  2. Extract multiple attributes from seismic data. 
  3. Normalize and reduce dimensionality (e.g., PCA). 
  4. Apply classification (supervised or unsupervised). 
  5. Validate with well facies logs. 
  6. Generate 3D facies volume or maps. 
  7. Interpret in geological terms (e.g., channel sands, shales, carbonates). 

Advantages

  • Objective, repeatable, and data-driven. 
  • Captures subtle seismic variations not visible to the eye. 
  • Integrates seismic and well information. 
  • Essential for reservoir modeling and facies prediction.

Two Major Approaches

   1. Unsupervised facies classification

  • No prior knowledge from wells. 
  • Groups data based on attribute similarity. 
  • Techniques: 
    • Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction. 
    • K-means clustering 
    • Self-Organizing Maps (SOM, Kohonen networks) 

          🟠 Goal: Detect hidden patterns and classify seismic volumes               into facies automatically.

    2. Supervised facies classification

  • Uses training data from wells (known facies labels). 
  • Builds a predictive model between seismic attributes and known facies. 
  • Techniques: 
    • Bayesian classification 
    • Support Vector Machines (SVM) 
    • Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) 
    • Random Forests 

          🟢 Goal: Predict facies away from wells, providing 3D               facies maps.


    Example

Suppose you compute RMS amplitude, instantaneous frequency, and coherence from a 3D seismic volume.
Using SOM clustering, the data are divided into facies clusters.
Then, by comparing clusters with well facies logs, you can interpret:

  • Facies 1 → clean sandstone 
  • Facies 2 → shaly sand 
  • Facies 3 → marine shale

Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

 PCA is a statistical technique that reduces a large set of correlated variables (attributes) into a smaller set of uncorrelated variables called principal components (PCs). Each principal component is a linear combination of the original attributes. The first few components usually explain most of the variability in the data.

In seismic studies, we may have dozens to hundreds of attributes (amplitude, frequency, coherence, curvature, etc.). Many are redundant (e.g., RMS amplitude, reflection strength, and envelope all measure signal energy). PCA helps by: 

  • Removing redundancy.
  • Reducing dimensionality.
  • Highlighting the most significant variations in the data.
  • Creating composite attributes that better separate geological features.

How PCA Works (Step by Step)

          1. Standardize the data 

  • Normalize each attribute so they have comparable scales.
  • Example: RMS amplitude values might range in 100s, while coherence is between 0–1.

         2. Compute the covariance matrix 

  • Measures how attributes vary with each other.

         3. Calculate eigenvalues and eigenvectors 

  • Eigenvectors = direction of maximum variance (new attribute axes).
  • Eigenvalues = amount of variance explained by each axis.

         4. Rank the components 

  • PC1 (first principal component) explains the maximum variance.
  • PC2 explains the next largest variance (orthogonal to PC1).
  • PC3, PC4, etc., explain progressively less.

         5. Project data into new space 

  • The seismic attributes are transformed into a smaller set of PCs.

 

Practical Example in Seismic

  • Suppose you extract 10 seismic attributes around a channel system.
  • PCA shows: 
    • PC1 = mostly amplitude-based attributes (RMS, reflection strength, envelope).
    • PC2 = mostly geometric attributes (coherence, curvature).
    • PC3 = mostly spectral attributes (dominant frequency, spectral energy).
  • Instead of interpreting 10 maps, you now interpret 3 principal components that capture the essential information.

Advantages of PCA

  • Reduces data size while preserving most information.
  • Removes redundancy between correlated attributes.
  • Helps identify hidden patterns in attribute space.
  • Often used as a preprocessing step before clustering or machine learning.

Limitations

  • PCA is linear → may miss non-linear relationships.
  • PCs are mathematical combinations of attributes, not always directly interpretable geologically.
  • Requires careful scaling and validation with well data.

PCA ANALYSIS on real data

PCA analysis base on 8 seismic attributes:  instantaneous amp,  average energy, reflection strength, instantaneous phase,  instantaneous frequency,  dominant frequency, spectral energy and semblance. PCi were sorted based on maximum correlation of Eigenvalues. 

Copyright © 2025 Geoscientist Artificial Intelligent - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept