Geoscientist Artificial Intelligence
Geoscientist Artificial Intelligence
  • Home
  • Processing & Imaging
    • Anisotropy Analysis
    • Deconvolution
    • Inverse Q Filtering
    • Migration
    • Multiple Attenuation
    • Noise Attenuation
    • Ray Tracing
    • Stacking
    • Static Correction
    • Velocity & NMO Analysis
    • Waveform Modeling
    • Wave Equation Datuming
  • Q-Interpretation
    • AVO Analysis
    • Data Conditioning
    • Facies Analysis
    • INVERSION
    • Rock Physics Modeling
    • Seismic Attributes
    • Spectral Blending
    • Time to Depth Convrsion
  • More
    • Home
    • Processing & Imaging
      • Anisotropy Analysis
      • Deconvolution
      • Inverse Q Filtering
      • Migration
      • Multiple Attenuation
      • Noise Attenuation
      • Ray Tracing
      • Stacking
      • Static Correction
      • Velocity & NMO Analysis
      • Waveform Modeling
      • Wave Equation Datuming
    • Q-Interpretation
      • AVO Analysis
      • Data Conditioning
      • Facies Analysis
      • INVERSION
      • Rock Physics Modeling
      • Seismic Attributes
      • Spectral Blending
      • Time to Depth Convrsion
  • Home
  • Processing & Imaging
    • Anisotropy Analysis
    • Deconvolution
    • Inverse Q Filtering
    • Migration
    • Multiple Attenuation
    • Noise Attenuation
    • Ray Tracing
    • Stacking
    • Static Correction
    • Velocity & NMO Analysis
    • Waveform Modeling
    • Wave Equation Datuming
  • Q-Interpretation
    • AVO Analysis
    • Data Conditioning
    • Facies Analysis
    • INVERSION
    • Rock Physics Modeling
    • Seismic Attributes
    • Spectral Blending
    • Time to Depth Convrsion

Spectral blending

Spectral blending (often called RGB spectral decomposition) is a seismic visualization technique where different frequency components of the seismic signal are extracted (using spectral decomposition methods like Fourier, Wavelet, or S-transform) and then assigned to different color channels (Red, Green, Blue)in an image. This allows interpreters to see thin beds, channels, reefs, and stratigraphic details that are not visible in the broadband seismic data.

How It Works

Spectral blending specifically blends spectral decomposition results(e.g., 15 Hz, 30 Hz, 60 Hz) into a color composite.

⚙️ Detailed Workflow

     1. Spectral Decomposition 

  • Compute frequency-dependent amplitude volumes using methods like: 
    • Short-Time Fourier Transform (STFT)
    • Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT)
    • Matching Pursuit Decomposition (MPD)
  • Result → amplitude cubes: A_15Hz, A_30Hz, A_60Hz
     2. Amplitude Normalization 
  • Normalize each frequency amplitude to a consistent dynamic range (e.g., 0–1 or percentile scaling).
  • Prevents one band from dominating visually.
     3. RGB Assignment 
  • R → Low frequency (e.g., 15 Hz)
  • G → Mid frequency (e.g., 30 Hz)
  • B → High frequency (e.g., 60 Hz)
  • RGB(x,z)=[A15​(x,z),A30​(x,z),A60​(x,z)]
      4. Blending 
  • Combine into a single color image.
  • Optionally overlay on amplitude or coherence section for context.

Implementation in Software

Most seismic interpretation platforms (e.g., Petrel, OpendTect, Kingdom, Geoteric) allow color blending via an RGB panel:You can assign each attribute (or filtered frequency) to a color channel. Adjust the gain or stretch of each to balance intensity.Optionally, use transparency or opacity blending to overlay on amplitude data.Example setup:RGB Channel   Attribute                               Description

========================================================= R Coherence                 (Faults and discontinuities)

G  Curvature                  (Structural deformation)

B  Sweetness                 ((AVO) Lithologic variation or 

                                             hydrocarbon indicator).

=========================================================

This composite allows simultaneous visualization of structure, stratigraphy, and lithology.


frequency decomposition algorithms are classified in there methods:

  • Constant Bandwidth
  • Constant Q
  • High Definition Frequency Decomposition

The Constant Bandwidth algorithm uses a constant filter length defined by the lowest central frequency set by the user and offers the highest frequency resolution, but it is the weakest when it comes to vertical resolving power. The Constant Q algorithm utilities a variable filter length, thus a variable bandwidth, and has a better vertical resolution than the previous approach. The best vertical resolution is provided by the High Definition Frequency Decomposition (HDFD). 


 The quickest way to a useful frequency decomposition color blend is to use the Exponential Constant Q option in the Frequency Decomposition workflow. A reference time slice should be chosen to reflect the potentially most prospective interval. Generate a spectrum along this time slice, then modify the minimum and maximum frequencies so that they correspond to frequency values where the power spectrum reaches 30-50% of its peak value (note that the vertical axis of the graph is divided into 10 equal intervals). 

Once an object of interest has been identified, the combined frequencies can be selected in a more focused manner. 


Another way to optimize the frequencies for a color blend is to visually compare the different frequency magnitude responses in the Data Preview window of the Frequency Decomposition tool.

Geologic Meaning

Dominant Color   Frequency Band  Interpretation

=========================================================

Red                        Low (15 Hz)            Thick beds or broad features

Green                    Mid (30 Hz)            Intermediate bed thickness

Blue                       High (60 Hz)         Thin beds or sharp boundaries

Cyan/Magenta    Mixed                      Transition zones or                              

/Yellow/White                                        complex layering


🔹 Interpretation Uses

  • Channel delineation: channels often show strong color contrast due to frequency attenuation or tuning.
  • Thin-bed tuning detection: high-frequency dominance (blue) highlights tuned reflections.
  • Facies differentiation: lithologic changes alter dominant frequency response.
  • Hydrocarbon indicators: gas-charged sands often exhibit local spectral anomalies.

Spectral (RGB) blending

Frequency zone of Interest:

Low frequency zone: (6-25 Hz),    Mid frequency zone: (30-45 Hz),   High frequency zone:  (50-80 Hz)

Spectral (RGB) blending

Frequency zone of Interest:

Low frequency zone: (6-27 Hz),    Mid frequency zone: (30-48 Hz),   High frequency zone:  (50-80 Hz)

Copyright © 2025 Geoscientist Artificial Intelligent - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept