AI Seismic Signal PROCESSING

Description

Seismic signal processing is a crucial aspect of geophysics that involves analyzing and manipulating seismic data to enhance the clarity and accuracy of subsurface images. The process begins with data acquisition, where sensors such as seismometers and geophones record seismic waves generated by controlled sources or natural events. This raw data is then subjected to pre-processing steps to remove noise and correct distortions. Techniques like de-noising, deconvolution, and statics correction ensure the data is clean and ready for detailed analysis. Seismic migration and velocity analysis are applied to reposition seismic events and create accurate subsurface models. These steps are essential for converting seismic travel times into depth, providing a clearer image of geological structures.

Advanced techniques such as seismic inversion, attribute analysis, and machine learning refine the seismic data, transforming it into quantitative models that reveal rock properties and highlight geological anomalies. Seismic inversion, for instance, converts reflection data into models of acoustic impedance, while attribute analysis extracts features like amplitude and frequency to identify potential hydrocarbon reservoirs. The integration of high-performance computing and machine learning algorithms has revolutionized seismic signal processing, enabling the handling of large datasets and complex calculations with greater efficiency and precision. These comprehensive and detailed subsurface images are vital for applications in oil and gas exploration, earthquake seismology, and environmental studies, facilitating more informed decisions and improved resource management.

DETERMINISTIC DECONVOLUTION

Spiking Deconvolution

These methods assume the wavelet is known or can be estimated directly.

Spiking deconvolution aims to compress the wavelet in each trace into a spike, enhancing resolution.

Explanation of Parameters:

The operator length parameter controls the length of the spiking filter. It should be chosen based on the expected wavelet duration.

This implementation assumes that the wavelet is minimum-phase. If the wavelet is not minimum-phase, additional preprocessing (e.g., phase correction) might be required.

Predictive Deconvolution

Predictive deconvolution is used to remove multiples and enhance primary reflections in seismic data. It works by designing a predictive filter that predicts and removes unwanted periodic components.

Explanation of Parameters:

prediction lag: The delay (in samples) for the predictive filter to predict future values based on past samples.
filter length: The length of the predictive filter (number of coefficients).

Execution Steps:

Autocorrelation Computation: The autocorrelation of each trace is computed to estimate the filter.
Toeplitz Matrix Construction: The autocorrelation is used to build a Toeplitz matrix, which represents the system of linear equations for the predictive filter.
Filter Design: The predictive filter coefficients are calculated by solving the system of equations.
Deconvolution Application: The predictive filter is applied to the trace using the filter function.

Notes:

Prediction Lag: Choose the prediction lag based on the periodicity of multiples or the expected delay of events.
Filter Length: The filter length should be sufficient to capture the waveform characteristics but not overly long to avoid overfitting.
Normalization: Ensure the input traces are normalized if necessary for stability.
Edge Effects: Predictive deconvolution may introduce edge effects near the beginning and end of the trace. Truncation or windowing can address this issue if needed.

Statistical DECONVOLUTION

Maximum Likelihood Deconvolution

Maximum Likelihood Deconvolution (MLD) is a method used to estimate the reflectivity series by maximizing the likelihood of the observed seismic data given the estimated reflectivity.

Explanation of Parameters

wavelet: A known wavelet used to convolve with the reflectivity.
noise variance: The variance of the noise present in the data.
iterations: The number of iterations to optimize the reflectivity estimate.

Procedure Steps:

Initialization: Reflectivity is initialized randomly for each trace.
Forward Model: Convolve the estimated reflectivity with the wavelet to compute the modeled trace.
Residual Calculation: Compute the difference between the observed trace and the modeled trace.
Gradient Calculation: Compute the gradient of the likelihood function to update the reflectivity estimate.
Iteration: Repeat the process for the specified number of iterations to refine the reflectivity estimate.

Notes

Wavelet: Ensure the wavelet is known or estimated accurately. You can use standard wavelets like Ricker or Klauder wavelets.
Noise Variance: The noise variance must be estimated or assumed based on the data quality.
Iterations: More iterations generally improve the reflectivity estimate but increase computation time.
Learning Rate: Adjust the learning rate (0.01 in the code) to ensure convergence without overshooting.

Minimum-Entropy Deconvolution (MED)

These methods rely on statistical properties of the seismic data.

Minimum-Entropy Deconvolution (MED) is used to enhance seismic data by focusing on producing sparse, spike-like signals. It minimizes the entropy of the signal, promoting sharp reflectivity sequences.

Explanation of Parameters

filter length: The length of the deconvolution filter (number of coefficients).
iterations: Number of iterations for the entropy minimization process.

Procedure Steps:

Filter Initialization: A random filter is initialized with a length specified by the user.
Entropy Minimization: The gradient of the entropy is computed to adjust the filter iteratively.
Filter Application: The final filter is convolved with the seismic trace to produce the deconvolved trace.
Normalization: The filter is normalized at each iteration to ensure numerical stability.

Notes

Learning Rate: The learning rate for filter updates (0.01 in this code) can be adjusted based on the data and convergence behavior.
Normalization: Filter normalization after each update ensures that the filter remains stable.
Iterations: More iterations can improve the result but increase computation time. Experiment with this parameter to balance performance and quality.
Entropy Function: The entropy minimization uses the sparseness criterion by minimizing the sum of the absolute values of the filtered signal.

Blind Deconvolution

Blind deconvolution aims to recover the reflectivity series (input signal) without knowing the source wavelet explicitly.

Explanation of Parameters:

filter length: The length of the blind deconvolution filter.
iterations: The number of iterations for optimizing the deconvolution process.

Procedure Steps:

Initialization: Randomly initialize a filter for each seismic trace.
Reflectivity Estimation: Use the current filter to estimate the reflectivity by convolving the trace with the filter.
Filter Update: Update the filter by minimizing the entropy of the estimated reflectivity.
Normalization: Normalize the filter at each step to ensure numerical stability.
Iteration: Repeat the process to refine the filter and the reflectivity estimate.

Notes

Filter Initialization: The filter is initialized randomly, but better initializations (e.g., matched filter estimates) can improve convergence.
Entropy Minimization: The filter is updated to minimize the entropy of the estimated reflectivity, promoting sparsity.
Learning Rate: The learning rate (0.01 in the code) controls the step size of the filter updates. Adjust this based on the dataset.
Iterations: More iterations improve the result but increase computation time.
Edge Effects: Convolution introduces edge effects. Truncate or handle boundaries appropriately if needed.

Sparse DECONVOLUTION

L1-Norm Deconvolution

These methods assume that the reflectivity series is sparse (few significant reflections).

L1-Norm Deconvolution minimizes the L1 norm of the estimated reflectivity, promoting sparsity in the solution.

Explanation of Parameters:

wavelet: Known source wavelet used for modeling.
lambda: Regularization parameter controlling the tradeoff between data fidelity and sparsity.
iterations: Number of optimization iterations.

Procedure Steps:

Optimization:
- The algorithm iteratively refines the reflectivity estimate using gradient descent.
- The L1-norm penalty (lambda * sign(reflectivity)) promotes sparsity in the reflectivity.
Notes:

Regularization Parameter (lambda): Adjust lambda based on the desired level of sparsity in the reflectivity.
Learning Rate: The update step size (0.01) can be tuned for faster convergence.
Non-Negativity: The reflectivity is constrained to be non-negative, which is optional based on the application.

Lasso-Based Methods

This method minimizes the L1 norm of the solution while ensuring a good fit to the observed data.

Explanation 0f Parameters:

wavelet: Known wavelet used for modeling.
lambda: Regularization parameter controlling sparsity.

Procedure Steps: 1. Lasso Optimization:

The problem minimizes the sum of the squared error term (||trace - W * reflectivity||_2^2) and the sparsity-inducing L1 norm (||reflectivity||_1).
CVX: A MATLAB package for convex optimization is used to solve the Lasso problem.

2. Coordinate Descent:

Each coefficient of the reflectivity vector is updated iteratively.
The update uses a soft-thresholding operator to enforce the L1 penalty (sparsity).

3. Soft Thresholding:

The soft threshold function applies the sparsity-inducing shrinkage: x=sign(z)⋅max⁡(∣z∣−λ,0) x = \text{sign}(z) \cdot \max(|z| - \lambda, 0) x=sign(z)⋅max(∣z∣−λ,0)
This ensures sparse solutions.

4. No External Dependencies:

This implementation avoids using CVX, making it self-contained.

Notes

Adjust the lambda parameter to control the sparsity of the reflectivity.
Ensure that the wavelet matches the characteristics of the seismic data.
Parameter Tuning: Experiment with the lambda parameter to achieve the desired balance between sparsity and accuracy.
Performance: For large datasets, the loop-based approach may be slow. Optimization techniques or parallelization can improve performance.
Wavelet Choice: Ensure the wavelet is an appropriate representation of the system's impulse response.

Inversion-Based Deconvolution

Bayesian Deconvolution

These approaches are more computationally intensive but provide detailed models.

Bayesian deconvolution typically incorporates prior information about the reflectivity series and noise. This implementation uses a Gaussian prior for reflectivity and noise.

Explanation of the Code:

1. Bayesian Framework:

The reflectivity is modeled with a Gaussian prior
The observed seismic trace is modeled as: y=Wx+n,n∼N(0,σn2I)y = W x + n, \quad n \sim \mathcal{N}(0, \sigma_n^2 I)y=Wx+n,n∼N(0,σn2I)
Posterior Distribution:
The posterior distribution of xxx is also Gaussian with:
- Mean: μx=(WTW/σn2+I/σx2)−1WTy/σn2\mu_x = \left(W^T W / \sigma_n^2 + I / \sigma_x^2 \right)^{-1} W^T y / \sigma_n^2μx=(WTW/σn2+I/σx2)−1WTy/σn2
- Covariance: Σx=(WTW/σn2+I/σx2)−1\Sigma_x = \left(W^T W / \sigma_n^2 + I / \sigma_x^2 \right)^{-1}Σx=(WTW/σn2+I/σx2)−1
2. Implementation:
The posterior mean μx\mu_xμx is computed for each seismic trace.
The noise variance (σn2\sigma_n^2σn2) and prior variance (σx2\sigma_x^2σx2) are user-defined parameters.

Notes: 1. Tuning Parameters:

Adjust noise variance and prior variance to control the balance between data fidelity and smoothness.

2. Efficient Computation:

Matrix inversions are precomputed since WTW/σn2+I/σx2W^T W / \sigma_n^2 + I / \sigma_x^2WTW/σn2+I/σx2 remains constant for all traces.

3. Gaussian Prior:

The reflectivity is assumed to be Gaussian, which provides a smooth solution. For sparse reflectivity, consider alternative priors (e.g., Laplacian).

Stochastic Inversion Deconvolution

Stochastic Inversion Deconvolution aims to recover a reflectivity series by modeling it probabilistically. It involves generating multiple realizations of reflectivity based on prior and likelihood models and then averaging them to obtain the deconvolved output.

Explanation of parameters:

1. Input Parameters:

input: The seismic data.
wavelet: The known wavelet used to convolve the reflectivity.
number of realizations: Number of random realizations to sample from the posterior distribution.
noise variance: Variance of the additive noise in the data.
prior variance: Variance of the reflectivity prior.

2. Posterior Distribution:

The reflectivity series is modeled with a Gaussian prior.
The posterior mean and covariance are computed based on the prior and likelihood.

3. Stochastic Sampling:

Random samples are drawn from the posterior using Cholesky decomposition to generate multiple realizations of the reflectivity series.

4. Result Averaging:

The mean of all realizations is taken as the final deconvolved result.

Key Features: Stochastic Realizations:

Multiple realizations of the reflectivity series are generated to capture uncertainty.

Posterior Sampling:

Samples are drawn from a multivariate Gaussian distribution with the computed posterior mean and covariance.

Robust Output:

Averaging multiple realizations provides a robust estimate of the reflectivity.

Points for Extension

1. Parameter Tuning:

Experiment with the number of realizations, noise variance, and prior variance parameters to observe their effects on the results.

2. Uncertainty Quantification:

Use the standard deviation of the realizations to quantify uncertainty in the deconvolution results.

3. Real Data:

Apply this method to real seismic data for validation and compare with other deconvolution methods.

Adaptive and Machine Learning Deconvolution

Neural Network-Based Deconvolution

Modern approaches leverage adaptive algorithms and machine learning.

This approach uses a simple feedforward neural network to approximate the inverse operation of convolution. Each column of the 2D input matrix is treated as a separate trace, and the network is trained to predict the reflectivity series for each trace.

Explanation of parameters:

1. Synthetic Training Data:

Reflectivity is generated randomly, and synthetic seismic data is obtained by convolving the reflectivity with the wavelet.

2. Neural Network Structure:

A simple feedforward neural network with one hidden layer is used.
Input Layer: Size matches the number of samples in a trace.
Hidden Layer: Configurable size (number of neurons).
Output Layer: Same size as the input, producing the reflectivity series.

3. Activation Function:

ReLU (Rectified Linear Unit) is used as the activation function.

4. Loss Function:

Mean Squared Error (MSE) is used to compute the error between predicted and true reflectivity.

5. Training:

Gradient descent is used to update weights and biases during training.

6. Deconvolution:

After training, the network is applied to the input seismic data to produce deconvolved traces.

Notes:

1. Parameter Tuning:

The number of epochs, learning rate, and hidden layer size can significantly affect performance.

2. Training Data:

Ensure the synthetic training data closely resembles the characteristics of real seismic data.

3. Scalability:

Neural network training can be computationally expensive for large datasets.

4. Extension:

You can use MATLAB's Deep Learning Toolbox for more complex neural network architectures (e.g., convolutional neural networks).

Dictionary Learning

This approach involves learning a sparse dictionary representation of seismic traces and then using it to estimate the reflectivity.

Explanation of parameters:

1. Dictionary Initialization:

A random dictionary is initialized with number of atoms.
Each column of the dictionary represents a basis function (atom).

2. Sparse Coding:

The Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) algorithm is used to find a sparse representation of each seismic trace.

3. Dictionary Update:

The dictionary is updated iteratively using the K-SVD algorithm. Each atom is adjusted based on its contribution to the input matrix.

4. Normalization:

Dictionary columns are normalized after each iteration to ensure stability.

5. Output Reconstruction:

The learned dictionary and sparse codes are multiplied to reconstruct the reflectivity.

Key Parameters:

1. Number of Atoms (num_atoms):

Determines the size of the dictionary.
Larger dictionaries provide more flexibility but require more computation.

2. Sparsity Level (sparsity_level):

Controls the number of non-zero coefficients in the sparse representation.

3. Number of Iterations (num_iterations):

More iterations improve convergence but increase computation time.

Time-Frequency and Multi-Domain Deconvolution

Spectral Balancing

These methods operate in transformed domains to enhance resolution.

Spectral Balancing Deconvolution enhances the seismic signal by equalizing its frequency spectrum. This method applies spectral shaping by balancing the amplitude spectrum to a desired shape, typically a flat spectrum, to improve resolution.

Explanation of parameters:

1. Input Parameters:

input: 2D seismic data matrix.
freq_range: Frequency range [fmin, fmax] for balancing.
smooth_factor: Window size for smoothing the amplitude spectrum.

2. Processing Steps:

For each seismic trace:
1. Compute the frequency spectrum using FFT.
2. Calculate the amplitude spectrum and phase spectrum.
3. Smooth the amplitude spectrum with a moving average.
4. Define a target spectrum (typically flat within the frequency range).
5. Balance the spectrum by dividing the target spectrum by the smoothed spectrum.
6. Reconstruct the balanced signal using the inverse FFT.
3. Frequency Range:
Balancing is applied only within the specified frequency range (freq_range), ensuring meaningful enhancement.

Notes:

1. Frequency Range (freq_range):

Controls the range of frequencies to balance. For example, [0.1, 0.4] in normalized units (0–0.5).

2. Smoothing Factor (smooth_factor):

Determines the smoothness of the amplitude spectrum. Larger values result in smoother spectra.

3. Sampling Rate (fs):

Adjust fs to the actual sampling rate of your data (default is 1 for normalized frequencies).

This code efficiently balances the spectrum of seismic data and improves the resolution by addressing spectral distortions.

Wavelet Transform-Based Deconvolution

This approach leverages the wavelet transform to isolate features of the seismic data and deconvolve by removing unwanted components while preserving key signal characteristics.

Explanation of parameters:

1. Wavelet Decomposition:

Each seismic trace is decomposed into a set of wavelet coefficients using wavedec.
The coefficients represent the signal at different resolutions and frequency bands.

2. Thresholding:

Soft thresholding (wthresh) is applied to the coefficients to suppress noise while retaining significant features.

3. Reconstruction:

The denoised coefficients are used to reconstruct the signal using waverec.

4. Parameters:

wavelet_name: Specifies the wavelet type (e.g., 'db4', 'sym5').
decomposition_level: Determines the number of levels in the wavelet transform.
threshold: Controls the degree of denoising (higher values remove more noise).

Notes:

1. Wavelet Name (wavelet_name):

Examples include 'db4' (Daubechies), 'sym5' (Symlets), 'coif3' (Coiflets), and 'haar'.

2. Decomposition Level (decomposition_level):

Determines the number of scales in the wavelet transform.
Higher levels analyze lower frequencies in more detail.

3. Threshold (threshold):

Larger values result in more aggressive noise removal, which may risk losing weaker signal components.

This code is adaptable to various wavelet families and can be tuned based on the characteristics of the input seismic data.

Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD)

This approach uses EMD to decompose the seismic data into intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) and selectively reconstructs the signal to suppress noise and enhance the reflectivity signal.

Explanation of parameters:

1. Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD):

Decomposes the input signal into a set of intrinsic mode functions (IMFs).
IMFs represent oscillatory components at different frequencies.

2. Energy-Based Filtering:

The energy of each IMF is calculated.
IMFs with energy above a specified threshold are retained, while others are discarded.

3. Signal Reconstruction:

The deconvolved signal is reconstructed by summing the selected IMFs.

4. Parameters:

threshold: Determines which IMFs to retain based on their relative energy.

Threshold Selection:

A value between 0.01 and 0.1 is typical for seismic applications, depending on the noise level and signal characteristics.

Notes:

EMD is effective for non-linear and non-stationary signals, making it suitable for seismic data.
For more robust decomposition, consider Enhanced EMD variants like Ensemble EMD (EEMD) or Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (CEEMD).

AI Seismic Signal PROCESSING

Description

DETERMINISTIC DECONVOLUTION

Spiking Deconvolution

Predictive Deconvolution

Spiking Deconvolution

Predictive Deconvolution

Statistical DECONVOLUTION

Maximum Likelihood Deconvolution

Minimum-Entropy Deconvolution (MED)

Blind Deconvolution

Sparse DECONVOLUTION

L1-Norm Deconvolution

Lasso-Based Methods

Maximum Likelihood Deconvolution

L1-Norm Deconvolution

Inversion-Based Deconvolution

Bayesian Deconvolution

Stochastic Inversion Deconvolution

Explanation of parameters:

Points for Extension

Bayesian Deconvolution

Stochastic Deconvolution

Adaptive and Machine Learning Deconvolution

Neural Network-Based Deconvolution

Explanation of parameters:

Notes:

Dictionary Learning

Explanation of parameters:

Key Parameters:

Time-Frequency and Multi-Domain Deconvolution

Spectral Balancing

Explanation of parameters:

Notes:

Wavelet Transform-Based Deconvolution

Explanation of parameters:

Notes:

Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD)

Explanation of parameters:

Notes:

Spectral Balancing

Discover the latest breakthroughs with Geoscientist Artificial Intelligent - Science and Technology at its finest!

This website uses cookies.